Wild Sky Wilderness
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:04 pm
As copied from the PNW4WDA forum - This area is over in Snohomish County near Gold Bar. If anyone knows of the Reiter area - this was part of it up top! I hoped I would have never seen this day - I gotta say that because I have not lived in the area for 3 years - that I lost track till I heard a blurb on the news. Yet, another reminder to never say, someone else will write that letter or I do it next time. If hyou do have a moment right now - take ACTION on this or anything else - EVERYTIME, or you too may or will lose your favorite wheeling area! this should have NOT ever have gotten this far! Pam
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is the latest information and final action item we can do with regards to Wild Sky Wilderness. As you read the previous posts it gives to some history of the bill and information that has been acquired over the past six years.
The following is a combined effort from the IAD and WA. St. Directors offices - "we need to ask President Bush to veto Section 101 of S.2739 - Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008." Some items you might want to include in your letter would be:
) Creation of the Wild Sky Wilderness should have been done as a separate bill not attached to a Natural Resouirces Act that included over sixty proposals. This was a massive bill that extended federal immigration and labor laws (Western Island of Marinans); granted a delegate in the House with limited voting powers (Guam - Puerto Rico ); to creating Heritage Areas on the east coast (Illinois and New York). Because this bill included popular projects across the nation - it found strong support for passage.
) In the early stages while acquiring information - the Forest Service testified that 90,000 acres of the 106,000 proposed would be appropriate for wilderness - however, 16,000 are problematic. With human intervention, these acres have been previously harvested, roads and bridges constructed, and contain mining activities.
) It has been six years since active public participatition took place - citizens given opporunity to submit their input, but the question now is: Does the land designation have the support from the local community; and will the NW Forest Plan be amended to address HR822 which removed 14% of land identified for timber harvest (matrix lands) and designated them as wilderness?
) Legislation to designate new wilderness should reflect the intent of the 1964 Wilderness Act and should not contain special exceptions. It seems each designation comes with a different interpretation and lowers the bar on what constitutes wilderness protection and dilutes the meaning of the Act.
) Washington State has 9 million acres of public land and 2.2 million acres of those lands are in "Wilderness." More wilderness is not needed.
) Under the 1964 Wilderness Act, wilderness designations are the most strigent protection for federal/public lands. They generally prohibit roads or permanent structures as well as mining, logging and most vehicular and mechanized (Mountain Bike) traffic. The proposed wilderness area includes 27 miles of existing roads; to remove the roads and culverts will cost $6 million alone; the cost to the taxpayers of this designation will be $19 million plus.
) We do support keeping our public lands open for all to enjoy.
Contact information:
President Bush <comments@whitehouse .gov> or (202)456-1111.
Please note - It is states on the website - "due to the large volume of e-mail received, the White House can not respond to every message."
If you have any question or need clarification - please feel free to contact myself at <arlenebrooks@ comcast.net> or the IAD officers Don & Carol Jensen <iad1 or iad 2@pnw4wda.org>.
Please take time and let your voice be heard on the new wilderness designation - Veto Section 101 of Senate Bill 2739.
Thanks, Don, Carol and Arlene
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is the latest information and final action item we can do with regards to Wild Sky Wilderness. As you read the previous posts it gives to some history of the bill and information that has been acquired over the past six years.
The following is a combined effort from the IAD and WA. St. Directors offices - "we need to ask President Bush to veto Section 101 of S.2739 - Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008." Some items you might want to include in your letter would be:
) Creation of the Wild Sky Wilderness should have been done as a separate bill not attached to a Natural Resouirces Act that included over sixty proposals. This was a massive bill that extended federal immigration and labor laws (Western Island of Marinans); granted a delegate in the House with limited voting powers (Guam - Puerto Rico ); to creating Heritage Areas on the east coast (Illinois and New York). Because this bill included popular projects across the nation - it found strong support for passage.
) In the early stages while acquiring information - the Forest Service testified that 90,000 acres of the 106,000 proposed would be appropriate for wilderness - however, 16,000 are problematic. With human intervention, these acres have been previously harvested, roads and bridges constructed, and contain mining activities.
) It has been six years since active public participatition took place - citizens given opporunity to submit their input, but the question now is: Does the land designation have the support from the local community; and will the NW Forest Plan be amended to address HR822 which removed 14% of land identified for timber harvest (matrix lands) and designated them as wilderness?
) Legislation to designate new wilderness should reflect the intent of the 1964 Wilderness Act and should not contain special exceptions. It seems each designation comes with a different interpretation and lowers the bar on what constitutes wilderness protection and dilutes the meaning of the Act.
) Washington State has 9 million acres of public land and 2.2 million acres of those lands are in "Wilderness." More wilderness is not needed.
) Under the 1964 Wilderness Act, wilderness designations are the most strigent protection for federal/public lands. They generally prohibit roads or permanent structures as well as mining, logging and most vehicular and mechanized (Mountain Bike) traffic. The proposed wilderness area includes 27 miles of existing roads; to remove the roads and culverts will cost $6 million alone; the cost to the taxpayers of this designation will be $19 million plus.
) We do support keeping our public lands open for all to enjoy.
Contact information:
President Bush <comments@whitehouse .gov> or (202)456-1111.
Please note - It is states on the website - "due to the large volume of e-mail received, the White House can not respond to every message."
If you have any question or need clarification - please feel free to contact myself at <arlenebrooks@ comcast.net> or the IAD officers Don & Carol Jensen <iad1 or iad 2@pnw4wda.org>.
Please take time and let your voice be heard on the new wilderness designation - Veto Section 101 of Senate Bill 2739.
Thanks, Don, Carol and Arlene